In-office cup biopsy and laryngeal cytology versus operating room biopsy for the diagnosis of pharyngolaryngeal tumors: Efficacy and cost-effectiveness
| PROCEDENCIA(S): | Ciencia y Medicina, USS de La Patagonia. |
|---|---|
| CATEGORÍA(S): | Cirugía, Medicina General e Interna, Otorrinolaringología, Servicios y Cuidados en Ciencias de la Salud. |
| AUTOR(ES): | Felipe Castillo Farıas / Ignacio Cobeta / Rosalia Souviron / Rafael Barbera / Elena Mora / Amparo Benito / Ana Royuela. |
| TIPO DE MATERIAL: | Artículos, Investigación. |
| ARCHIVO: |
Reconocimiento CC BY. Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento CC BY 4.0 Internacional.
Background: In-office biopsy is an effective technique to diagnose the nature of pharyngolaryngeal lesions. Methods. We selected patients with pharyngolaryngeal lesions suspicious for malignancy. For in-office biopsy procedures, laryngeal cytology and direct laryngoscopy biopsy were performed, and diagnostic parameters and costs were estimated. Results. Eighty-eight patients were selected for this study. For laryngeal cytology, sensitivity was 70.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 5 59.9% to 80.7%), specificity 100% with a positive predictive value of 100% and a negative predictive value of 50% (95% CI 5 35.2% to 64.8%). Inoffice biopsy sensitivity was 81% (95% CI 5 72.6% to 89.3%), specificity 100% with a positive predictive value of 100% and a negative predictive value of 20% (95% CI 5 2.5% to 37.5%). At our hospital, the use of in-office biopsies as a first approach for diagnosis saves $50,140.80 U.S. per annum. Conclusion: In-office biopsy is a more affordable technique that enables histologic diagnosis of pharyngolaryngeal lesions in a large percentage of patients.
